Home‎ > ‎At the movies‎ > ‎

Real people, not actors

I saw a commercial not long ago that contained something unintentionally funny as well as being quite revealing.  I don’t remember what was being advertized, but they had people giving testimonials while words appeared on the screen that said, “Real people, not actors.”

 I think they spoke more truth than they realized.

I’m not saying that actors aren’t real people, but I am suggesting that many people seem to be unable to make a healthy distinction between people in the acting profession and the roles they play. They’re not in touch with the truth that Matt Damon the person isn't necessarily anything like Jason Bourne, the character he portrays in three movies. Or, they feel as if they know a certain actor or actress because they can relate to a role they played or something the media churned up about them to publicize their latest movie and help sell magazines and tabloids.  There are some who buy clothes, cars, or other products because celebrities recommend them.  Others go to further extremes and do things to their bodies in an attempt to achieve “the look” (often surgically or photographically augmented), an actress or actor has.  Still others fashion their political/social/spiritual views after celebrities or imitate the lifestyles they see portrayed by them in movies or real life (and sometimes the line between the two is admittedly blurry).  My point in all of this is that we’re mistaken if we think the entertainment industry is simply about entertaining.  Whether we listen or not, they are cultural prophets and their message is heard and heeded by many.    

So when we’re told that by a celebrity couple that they’re "engaged" after years of living together and having several children (through birth and adoption), we’re supposed to be impressed that they demur marriage until "it’s legal for everyone else.”   Apparently in their minds they can engage in the sexual relationship that God reserved exclusively for marriage, live together like married people, have children together, and still expect us to believe they're taking the high ground in regard to their “stand” on marriage.  Please, it should be clear to all that their only use for marriage is to promote their political and social views.  If they had any respect for it, they wouldn’t live in mockery of it.      

The saddest part is that this is not an isolated example just an especially insidious one as adopting children and being publicly doting parents somehow makes non-existent their impenitent promiscuity, infidelities, and promotion of homosexuality. It all makes me think of a house in a historical district where the owners gut the interior, fail to maintain the exterior, but keep the original slate roof in pristine condition and claim they are maintaining the house!  I suppose if you ignored everything else and looked only at the roof you would accept their conclusion. 

But that wouldn’t mean it was the truth.

It wouldn’t mean it was right.

It wouldn’t mean it was good.
Back to Home